JESSON||RAINS ATTORNEYS AT LAW
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Wills and Trusts
    • Business Law & Litigation
  • Team
    • Edward Jesson - Attorney
    • Kelly Rains Jesson - Attorney
    • Jeneva Vazquez - Senior Associate
    • Heather McKaig - Senior Associate
    • Jeremy Billings ​- Paralegal
    • Sydney Stephan ​- Paralegal
    • Mercedes DeFeo ​- Paralegal
    • Sue Lambert - Office Manager
    • Kate Seña ​- Executive Assistant
  • News & Blog
  • Contact
  • Testimonials
  • Free Resources
    • Business Resources
    • Estate Planning Resources
    • Probate Resources
  • Newsletter
📞 704-444-0594

Blog

Ding Dong, The Witch (BOIR) is Dead!

3/5/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
​By Attorney Kelly Jesson

As you know, we’ve been back and forth numerous times on whether or not business owners in the United States have to file a Beneficial Owner Information Report (BOIR) with FinCen as part of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA).

The Treasury Department finally killed it on Sunday.  On March 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury announced that it will be issuing a new rule making the BOIR reporting requirements apply to foreign companies only.  The Treasury Department also announced that it will not enforce any penalties or fines for failing to file the BOIR pending the implementation of the new rule.

We’re pretty confident this signals the death of the BOIR rule.  If you have any questions about this, please contact Jesson & Rains for more information. 
0 Comments

It’s Baaaackkkk … The Corporate Transparency Act

2/21/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Attorney Kelly Jesson

As you all know by now, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined the Corporate Transparency Act (“CTA”) pending oral arguments, scheduled for March 25, 2025.  What you may not have known is that there were two federal cases in Texas and one of them went up to the Supreme Court.  The Supreme Court overruled the injunction in January, but because there was a nationwide injunction in place for the second case, we still didn’t have to comply with the CTA.

On February 17, in light of the Supreme Court’s order, the judge in the second Texas case cancelled the injunction.  FinCen has set a deadline of March 21, 2025, for all reporting companies to file their BOIR reports.

Oral arguments are scheduled for March 25, after the reporting deadline.  Congress has passed a bill extending the compliance deadline to January 1, 2026, and there’s also been legislation introduced to repeal the CTA.  FinCen itself has stated that it’s going to change its policies to relieve some burden on small businesses.

However, it’s unlikely that any of these will occur prior to March 21, 2025, so we will be working with our clients to get the BOIR reports filed.  If you need assistance from us, please let us know.
0 Comments

Happy New Year! Corporate Transparency Act on hold once again!

1/3/2025

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Attorney Kelly Jesson

We are writing to clarify the status of the Corporate Transparency Act since there was a lot of activity over the holidays!  On December 23, 2024, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals granted FinCEN’s emergency motion for a stay of the Texas federal court’s order enjoining the Corporate Transparency Act.  Immediately, FinCEN came out with a press release outlining the due dates for Beneficial Owner Report filings.  Social media and inboxes were filled with warnings and panic.

However, after an emergency rehearing en banc on December 26 (these lawyers and judges took no holiday leave apparently!), the Fifth Circuit again entered an order allowing for the injunction to continue while the case is litigated.

What does this mean for you?  Until there is an official ruling on the constitutionality of the Corporate Transparency Act, no Beneficial Owner Reports are required to be filed.
0 Comments

The Corporate Transparency Act is On Hold!

12/4/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Attorney Kelly Jesson

If you don’t know what The Corporate Transparency Act is, you can read about it here and here. We had been hopeful all year that it would be invalidated, and we had intentionally waited until the end of the year to file the Beneficial Owner Information Reports (“BOIR”) on behalf of our clients.  In the past few weeks, we have been working on getting the BOIRs done since the deadline is less than a month away and we were beginning to lose hope.

Alas, our prayers were answered yesterday!  A federal judge in Texas has issued a preliminary injunction blocking enforcement of the requirement to report the beneficial owners of businesses because the law is “likely unconstitutional.” The order states that companies nationwide do not need to comply with the Jan. 1 reporting deadline unless and until a higher court reverses the order.

What does this mean for you?  For now, there’s no need to report.  But we do need to continue to watch this situation, as the law will surely be litigated in the future.  We probably have not heard the last of the Corporate Transparency Act.
0 Comments

Not So Fast . . . Non-Competes are Back!

8/29/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Attorney Kelly Jesson

We previously reported back in April that the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) banned non-compete agreements effective September 4.  Almost immediately, the rule was challenged in many courts.  Earlier this week, a federal judge in Dallas struck down the ban across the entire nation, holding that it was “unreasonably overbroad” and the FTC lacked the authority to enact the rule.  Therefore, local business owners can continue to utilize non-compete agreements to protect their proprietary information when an employee with insider knowledge leaves to work elsewhere.  However, our courts will not enforce a non-compete agreement that is not narrowly tailored in scope and geographical area to accomplish that goal, so business owners should seek the assistance of an attorney when putting these in place.

If you have any questions, or need assistance with an employment agreement, please give Jesson & Rains a call! 
0 Comments

Supreme Court Ruling Affects Small Business Valuations

7/3/2024

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Attorney Kelly Jesson

The Supreme Court has issued many newsworthy rulings recently, but one you might not be familiar with is the Connelly Case.  In Connelly v. United States, the Supreme Court held that the value of life insurance proceeds paid out to a business after the death of one of its owners must be included in the date of death valuation of the business. 
 

For the past twenty years, life insurance paid to a business as the result of an owner’s death has not been included in the business valuation if the business had an obligation to purchase the deceased owner’s interest in the business back. The reasoning was that this was a liability that the business owed.  If a business was paid $3 million dollars in life insurance but it was obligated to pay the deceased owner’s family $3 million dollars, then it’s a wash. 

The implications of this ruling are significant.  A business that is the beneficiary of life insurance proceeds may be valued much higher than it “really” is.  For example, let’s say there are two owners of Widget Corp.  The business is worth $5 million, so the owners each had $2.5 million dollars in insurance taken out by the corporation.  At the death of one of the owners, the corporation was to redeem the deceased owner’s shares, which were worth $2.5 million prior to death.  After the Supreme Court ruling, the business is actually worth $7.5 million ($5 million + life insurance).  If the agreement was to pay half the value, the corporation would owe the family $3.75 million but only have $2.5 million in cash to do so. 
 

For people who may have to pay estate taxes (oftentimes business owners!), the difference in a few million dollar valuation can result in huge tax payments. And to add insult to injury, the family could end up paying taxes on assets they didn’t really get.  In the above example, the true value of the business interests was $2.5 million but they would have to pay tax on the $3.75 million valuation if it was a taxable estate.

The ruling requires business owners to carefully review their buy-sell and operating agreements to see how valuations will be determined.  Is it the date of death value, or the value put on the business at the beginning of the year, or the value of the life insurance?  While you can’t exclude life insurance for IRS purposes, you may be able to for buy-out valuation purposes.

One way around this ruling is to use cross-purchase agreements.  Instead of the business owning the life insurance policy, the individual owners will own life insurance policies on each other. When one owner dies, the life insurance is paid out to the other owners, not the business.

Also, more people may utilize LLCs to own life insurance policies.  The problem with cross-purchase agreements is that if you have a lot of owners, you have a lot of policies.  If there are three owners, for example, there are six policies.  If you set up an LLC to own the insurance policies (and then the LLC uses the money to buy the deceased owner’s interest), there are fewer policies. In this example, there would be three instead of six.

If you would like additional information, or if you need a review of your business’s insurance and operating agreements, please don’t hesitate to contact the attorneys at Jesson & Rains. 
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Subscribe to our newsletter.

    Subscribe

    Author

    Kelly Rains Jesson
    ​Edward A. Jesson

    Categories

    All
    529 Plans
    ADR
    Alternative Dispute Resolution
    Amendments
    Asset Protection
    Asset Purchase
    Assumed Business Name
    B-Corps
    Blockchain
    Business
    Business Formation
    Business Law
    Business Litigation
    Business Purchase
    Business Scam
    Business Transactions
    Buy/sell
    Civil Procedure
    Collections
    Community
    Construction
    Contracts
    Copyrights
    Corporations
    COVID 19
    Cryptocurrency
    Data Privacy
    DBA
    Default
    Dissolution
    Elder Law
    Employment
    Estate Planning
    Ethics
    Eviction
    Firearms
    Firearm Trusts
    FLSA
    Guardianship
    Health Care Directive
    Holding Company
    Intellectual Property
    Landlord-Tenant
    Liens
    Litigation
    Living Will
    LLC
    News
    No Surprises Act
    Operating Agreement
    Partnership
    Patents
    Power Of Attorney
    Probate
    Real Property
    Retirement
    Secretary Of State
    Small Business
    Trademarks
    Trade Secrets
    Transactional
    Trusts
    Wills

    RSS Feed

    View my profile on LinkedIn

      Contact us.

    Submit

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015

Picture
Jesson & Rains, PLLC
5821 Fairview Road #218
Charlotte, NC 28209
(704) 444-0594
[email protected]

By appointment only.

SERVICES

Wills & Trusts Probate
Business Law & Litigation


Our Attorneys
Location

SUPPORT

Contact
Disclaimer
©Jesson & Rains, PLLC  ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Wills and Trusts
    • Business Law & Litigation
  • Team
    • Edward Jesson - Attorney
    • Kelly Rains Jesson - Attorney
    • Jeneva Vazquez - Senior Associate
    • Heather McKaig - Senior Associate
    • Jeremy Billings ​- Paralegal
    • Sydney Stephan ​- Paralegal
    • Mercedes DeFeo ​- Paralegal
    • Sue Lambert - Office Manager
    • Kate Seña ​- Executive Assistant
  • News & Blog
  • Contact
  • Testimonials
  • Free Resources
    • Business Resources
    • Estate Planning Resources
    • Probate Resources
  • Newsletter